
For practical and legal reasons, Large Language Models are primarily trained on contemporary, web-based texts and not on the vast array of content found in published books. As a consequence, their competence does not capture the rich diversity of knowledge that libraries have worked to preserve and make accessible. Because of this epistemic gap, libraries can potentially play a crucial role in the development of future versions of these models. In this presentation, I will discuss a computational strategy designed to effectively quantify and utilize the knowledge contained within books, addressing the opportunities and challenges for libraries in this process.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
