
Active‑Inference and the continuous‑time Schrödinger bridge solve the same optimization: steer a noisy system from an initial probability cloud to a target one while straying as little as possible from its natural dynamics. The bridge is governed by a single scalar potential whose gradient splits into two complementary drifts—one pushes the present toward the goal, the other lets the goal propagate backward through time. Because both drifts minimize the same free‑energy functional, the target distribution itself behaves as a reverse‑time Active‑Inference agent. If the potential factorizes into an internal–active part and a sensory–external part, the familiar Markov‑blanket partition remains intact in both temporal directions. Under mild smoothness and constant‑diffusion assumptions, any Schrödinger‑bridge algorithm therefore doubles as a turnkey Active‑Inference controller and places teleological talk on a rigorous, time‑symmetric footing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
