
This meta-analysis investigates the relationship between students’ study habits and their academic performance across a range of educational levels and cultural settings. The study synthesizes findings from fifteen empirical studies selected through a systematic review of academic databases. These studies employed various research methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method designs. They examined the impact of behaviors such as time management, note-taking, goal setting, and self-testing on academic outcomes. The analysis reveals a positive association between effective study habits and academic performance. However, the strength of this relationship varies depending on factors such as educational level, cultural background, gender, learning environment, and institutional support. While many studies report a significant correlation, others show weak or non-significant results, highlighting the complexity of this relationship and the influence of contextual variables. This meta-analysis underscores the importance of integrating structured study skills training into educational programs and developing targeted interventions tailored to students’ individual needs and learning contexts. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how study behaviors affect academic success and offer practical implications for educators, academic advisors, and policymakers aiming to enhance student learning outcomes.
Academic Performance, Self-regulated learning, Study habits, Time management.
Academic Performance, Self-regulated learning, Study habits, Time management.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
