Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Transnational connections and barriers in DH: a UK-Chinese case study

Authors: Chen, Jing; Spence, Paul;

Transnational connections and barriers in DH: a UK-Chinese case study

Abstract

This report presents the findings of a comparative study of the digital humanitieslandscapes in the UK and China, based on a literature review and 45 in-depth interviewswith academics, funders, policymakers, and professionals across the cultural andtechnological sectors. It offers the first large-scale, qualitative cross-national comparisonof DH in these two countries and explores how cultural, institutional, and infrastructuralcontexts shape digital scholarship in the humanities. The research identifies both shared challenges and divergent trajectories in DHdevelopment. While the UK has a longer tradition of DH institutionalisation—rooted inacademic departments, project-based innovation, and integration with cultural heritageinstitutions—China’s DH field has grown rapidly in recent years, influenced by nationalstrategies, infrastructural ambitions, and an increasingly interdisciplinary academicenvironment.

Keywords

UK scholarship, multilingual digital humanities, Chinese scholarship, computational humanities, digital scholarship, global diversity, digital humanities, social sciences, humanities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?