
This article analyzes how teaching effectiveness research deals with context when investigating teaching quality. It examines three categories of variables that are often treated as context: classroom composition, content, and country. An in-depth analysis of the literature on teaching quality where these variables are treated as context suggests that context can have an effect on the empirical findings of teaching-quality research and that this could be an explanation for why results are often inconsistent. Analyzing the explicit and implicit conceptual assumptions about the relation between context and teaching quality in empirical studies revealed that classroom composition and content are often not considered essential to teaching quality, and that it is generally assumed that measures of teaching quality are internationally valid. The paper ends by discussing how future studies might approach the issue of context so that consistency in research on teaching quality is improved.
+repphzhbib2025F
10091 Institute of Education, 370 Education, Teaching quality, generalizability, teaching effectiveness, generalization, 3304 Education, context
10091 Institute of Education, 370 Education, Teaching quality, generalizability, teaching effectiveness, generalization, 3304 Education, context
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
