Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Agentic AI and Financial Compliance: Autonomous Systems for Regulatory Monitoring in Banking

Authors: Somu, Bharath;

Agentic AI and Financial Compliance: Autonomous Systems for Regulatory Monitoring in Banking

Abstract

With the rapid development of smart and autonomous systems, the rise of increasingly autonomous software and hardware agents has raised concerns for societies in terms of ethics, regulation, accountability, and law enforcement. Agentic AI refers to those artificial intelligence systems that have some level of autonomy and can act on behalf of a human user in a certain context. Industries are already relying heavily on agentic AI to monitor regulation compliance of businesses through natural language processing and a knowledge graph of regulations. Similar AI agents can be deployed in the financial industry to ensure rules compliance. The financial industry is highly regulated. Financial market and institution supervision is crucial but requires astronomical cost and human effort. To lessen the burden, many regulatory agencies already publish guidelines for horizontal regulation to ease compliance. The resulting regulatory text flood is unprecedentedly big and complex and thus serves as great risk for financial misconduct. Banks, as the major subject of compliance, have already deployed advanced models to extract structured information from these regulations. Rules extraction and representation leverages a knowledge graph on regulations with multi-level granularity, knowledge schema development, and automated rule generation based on reinforcement learning techniques. Nevertheless, implementing compliance measures against this knowledge graph requires tremendous human effort on rule coding that costs institutions millions of dollars annually. Compliance rule coding varies across financial institutions and must be ingrained into internal policies, which rules out a consolidated solution. Thus, a novel approach to autonomous compliance implementation against the knowledge graph of regulations is unmet and essential. To achieve goal-oriented agentic AI agent design, a potential solution needs to serve as a benchmark testing ground with the capped regulation space and benign financial domain for human-like compliant AI agents. Regulators can monitor automated compliance efforts and intervene if exploitations are discovered, and a regulatory sandbox is thus proposed. 

Keywords

Agentic AI,Financial Compliance,Regulatory Monitoring,Autonomous Systems,Banking Regulation,AI in Finance,Compliance Automation,Regulatory Technology (RegTech),Machine Learning Compliance,Risk Management AI,AI-Driven Auditing,Intelligent Agents,Real Time Monitoring,AI Ethics in Banking,Automated Regulatory Reporting, Agentic AI,Financial Compliance,Regulatory Monitoring,Autonomous Systems,Banking Regulation,AI in Finance,Compliance Automation,Regulatory Technology (RegTech),Machine Learning Compliance,Risk Management AI,AI-Driven Auditing,Intelligent Agents,Real Time Monitoring,AI Ethics in Banking,Automated Regulatory Reporting

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green