
The research compares the experiences of King Solomon's leadership with what is wrong with leadership in Nigeria nowadays, citing the fact that Solomon's failure to rule, characterised by power over-centralisation, oppressive taxation, forced labour, and haughtiness towards criticism, caused the collapse of his kingdom shortly after his rule. Similar to Nigeria, its nation also has issues of leadership traced back to corruption, complacency among elites, and power centralisation by its leaders. The study employs qualitative research based on biblical history, political science, and Nigerian history to study the leadership style of Solomon and its implications on current Nigerian political culture. It employs secondary sources like religious texts, political speeches, and research papers. The research points out that Solomon's shortcomings and Nigeria's current leadership challenges derive from an over-centralisation of power, economic imbalance, lack of consideration for the people's concerns, as well as a focus on pomp and ceremony at the expense of real development. All these lead to political instability and public disillusionment in Nigeria, just like the division of Israel during Solomon's time. The findings advocate a governance framework that encourages decentralisation, people-oriented approaches, and service- and justice-oriented ethical leadership. From lessons on Solomon's errors, Nigerian policy makers are called to embrace policies of the people's inclusion and thus cater for their needs with a view to nurturing national integration and sustainable development.
Administrative, misadventures, cautionary anecdote, political leaders, Old Testament
Administrative, misadventures, cautionary anecdote, political leaders, Old Testament
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
