
This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of AI-based text-to-speech (TTS) technology and traditional human voice recordings in fostering listening comprehension among Uzbek EFL learners. With the growing implementation of AI in education, TTS tools offer a promising alternative to human recordings, particularly in resource-limited contexts. Seventy-two intermediate-level secondary school students in Tashkent participated in a five-week intervention, where one group listened to AI-generated audio while the other engaged with native-speaker voice recordings based on identical scripts. Both groups completed comprehension quizzes and summary tasks to measure improvement. Findings indicate that while both approaches led to significant listening gains, students exposed to human voices performed slightly better in interpreting emotional tone, stress, and implicit meaning. Meanwhile, the AI TTS group demonstrated more consistent progress in recognizing vocabulary and understanding explicit content. Learners appreciated the clarity, predictability, and slower pacing of the TTS voices, which lowered anxiety and improved focus. Despite some limitations in expressiveness and naturalness, AI TTS tools proved to be an effective supplemental resource, especially in classrooms where access to native-speaker recordings is limited. The study concludes that a hybrid approach combining TTS and human voice recordings could offer the most balanced and accessible strategy for EFL listening instruction in Uzbekistan.
Artificial intelligence, text-to-speech, listening comprehension, EFL learners, Uzbek education, voice recordings, AI in language learning, digital pedagogy, listening instruction, audio materials
Artificial intelligence, text-to-speech, listening comprehension, EFL learners, Uzbek education, voice recordings, AI in language learning, digital pedagogy, listening instruction, audio materials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
