
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) refers to a class of methods and tools that make the decision-making processes of AI systems transparent, understandable, and accountable to human users, particularly in high-stakes applications such as healthcare, finance, autonomous systems, and cybersecurity where opaque models can hinder trust, safety, and compliance. With growing ethical and regulatory concerns around black-box AI models, XAI has become essential for ensuring interpretability, fairness, and responsible AI deployment. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review on XAI by first establishing its conceptual foundation, including definitions, explanation types, and the needs of various stakeholders. It then reviews a wide array of XAI techniques, distinguishing between model-specific and model-agnostic methods, and highlights visualization tools, surrogate models, and rule-based explanations. The study further analyzes prominent XAI libraries and platforms such as InterpretML, AIX360, Captum, and AWS Clarify, using evaluation criteria like fidelity, stability, complexity, and generalizability. Real-world applications across critical domains are discussed to demonstrate the value of XAI in enhancing trust and decision support. Finally, the paper identifies key challenges such as trade-offs between accuracy and interpretability, lack of standards, and explainability in deep models, while proposing future research directions involving causal inference, federated AI, human-centric design, and transparency in large language models and reinforcement learning systems.
Responsible AI, AI Transparency, XAI Applications, Model Interpretability, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Responsible AI, AI Transparency, XAI Applications, Model Interpretability, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
