Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Protocols of mixed-methods study on sociocultural, economic, and behavioural factors

Authors: Schneider-Kamp, Anna; Rageliene, Tija; Askegaard, Søren;

Protocols of mixed-methods study on sociocultural, economic, and behavioural factors

Abstract

This document is Deliverable 5.1 (“Protocols of mixed-methods study on sociocultural, economic, and behavioural factors”) of the CANCER PREVENTION AT WORK (CPW) project. It is issued under the responsibility of the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) with the contribution of a working group comprising principal investigators and team members from work packages WP2, WP3, and W4, as well as the project coordinator Prof. Dr. Paolo Boffetta and the project manager Alessandra Cataneo from the University of Bologna. The objective of WP5 is to identify, assess, and address the behavioural and sociocultural barriers and facilitators of the interventions against infection-related cancers conducted in WP2-WP4. In particular, we aim to do so by identifying the barriers and facilitators of the primary prevention interventions in this project through a mixed methods study. As a part of this study, we collect: • secondary data through a review of extant literature on sociocultural, economic, and behavioural barriers and facilitators of cancer prevention, • primary mixed quantitative/qualitative data through the baseline questionnaires of the involved workplace and occupational cohorts, and • primary qualitative data through focus groups with individuals from a subset of the workplace and occupational cohorts. This study represents the first phase in a multi-phased overall study design, which is similar to one that has been successfully employed in a large study on under- and never-screened populations in the context of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer.1 Special care is taken to facilitate the geographically and culturally dispersed data collection. Through the study described in deliverable D5.1, we aim to build a solid understanding of the sociocultural, economic, and behavioural factors influencing patterns of participation and nonparticipation in screening examinations (WP2 & WP3), patterns of hesitancy to vaccination interventions (WP4), and the patient pathways in case of positive screening results (WP2 & WP3).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research