Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pleuronectoidei

Authors: Campbell, Matthew A.; Chen, Wei-Jen; Chanet, Bruno; Chen, Jhen-Nien; Lee, Mao-Ying;

Pleuronectoidei

Abstract

4.1 | Pleuronectoidei taxonomy Flatfish taxonomy has long overlooked the family‐level diversity present in Pleuronectoidei. The earliest flatfish classification simply placed all fifteen known species into a single genus, Pleuronectes, within the order Thoracici without any family divisions present (Linnaeus, 1758). Later, Pleuronectidae of Cuvier contained five subfamilies, the Cynoglossinae, Hippoglossinae, Platessinae, Pleuronectinae and Soleinae (Cuvier, 1817). Additional complexity with flatfish taxonomy was advanced with the concept of flatfishes as a suborder, the Heterosamata, and two families— the Pleuronectidae and Soleidae (Jordan & Evermann, 1896). Subsequently, Regan (1910) proposed two suborders of the Psettodoidea with the single family of Psettodidae and the Pleuronectoidea with two divisions (Pleuronectiformes and Soleiformes). The Pleuronectiformes of Regan (1910) had two families, the Bothidae and Pleuronectidae, and a Soleiformes with two families, the Soleidae and Cynoglossidae. Since then, the largest divisions within the suborder Pleuronectoidei have followed a division between pleuronectids and their relatives (superfamily Pleuronectoidea; Nelson (2006)) and soleids and their relatives (superfamily Soleoidea; Nelson (2006)) such as Norman (1934) proposing three families for the flatfish lineage, Psettodidae, Bothidae and Pleuronectidae. From the two divisions with Pleuronectoidei, the distinction of Citharidae became evident in further investigations. Hubbs (1945) defined a Citharidae (Citharinae + Brachypleurinae) closely related to Scophthalmidae, and these being most closely related to all other Pleuronectoidea indicating another major division within the flatfish lineage and a concept that has been reflected in subsequent classifications (Chapleau, 1993; Hensley & Ahlstrom, 1984). The citharids composed of the genera Brachypleura, Citharoides, Citharus, Lepidoblepharon, and Paracitharus were demonstrated by Hoshino (2001) to be monophyletic—contradicting Chapleau (1993) who indicated they were paraphyletic—and the earliest‐branching lineage of Pleuronectoidei. The current taxonomy of the Pleuronectoidei may be characterized by three superfamilies: Citharoidea, Pleuronectoidea and Soleoidea (Chanet et al., 2004; Hoshino, 2001; Nelson, 2006). In this study, we find support for these three superfamilies.

Published as part of Campbell, Matthew A., Chen, Wei-Jen, Chanet, Bruno, Chen, Jhen-Nien & Lee, Mao-Ying, 2019, Origins and relationships of the Pleuronectoidei: Molecular and morphological analysis of living and fossil taxa, pp. 640-656 in Zoologica Scripta 48 (5) on page 648, DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12372, http://zenodo.org/record/15787530

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green