Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Green areas and mortality: a health impact assessment in the Florentine plain

Authors: Burbui, Giorgia; Nuvolone, Daniela; Borghi, Costanza; Chirici, Gherardo; Baccini, Michela;

Green areas and mortality: a health impact assessment in the Florentine plain

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONWith ~76% of population residing in urban areas, Europe has a high urbanization rate, expected to grow further. Urban expansion challenges public health, particularly amid climate change. Green spaces mitigate these effects, benefiting physical and mental health and reducing mortality. OBJECTIVEThis study quantifies the impact of green space exposure on avoidable deaths at the census tract level in 2021 in an urban area of Tuscany, including Florence and seven neighbouring municipalities. The analysis focuses on medium/long-term effects, comparing actual exposure with counterfactual scenarios of increased greenery. METHODExposure was assessed using the 2015 average Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) within 300m of each tract. Deaths in 2021 were estimated by redistributing municipality-level mortality data based on the tract-level demographics. Relative risks from literature adjusted for social deprivation. Mortality impacts were estimated for individuals aged over 35 years under three scenarios: (A) NDVI thresholds (0.5, 0.7, WHO-recommended), (B) +20% NDVI, and (C) +0.1 NDVI. The WHO threshold (25% green space) was converted to NDVI via a validated model. The exposure-response curve was estimated using a Bayesian replication of a recent meta-analysis. Uncertainty was accounted for via Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTSEstimated avoidable deaths: 335 [90% uncertainty interval: 0–785] for NDVI ≥0.5; 830 [0–1896] for NDVI ≥0.7. A +0.1 NDVI and +20% NDVI increase would save 305 [0–723] and 248 [0–585] deaths, respectively. The WHO threshold (NDVI = 0.33) suggests 54 avoidable deaths [0–128]. The central , with lower NDVI, showed the highest improvement potential. CONCLUSIONSDespite uncertainties, the impact is substantial. Urban forestry policies can mitigate avoidable deaths, highlighting the broader risks of green space scarcity. This approach can help public administrators recognize the value of investing in urban green spaces.

Keywords

EFUF2025

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green