Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.2...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.26434/chemr...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Cheminformatics
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
ZENODO
Article . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

PROTAC-Splitter: A Machine Learning Framework for Automated Identification of PROTAC Substructures

Authors: Ribes, Stefano; Zhang, Ranxuan; Cropsal, Télio; Källberg, Anders; Tyrchan, Christian; Nittinger, Eva; Mercado Oropeza, Rocío;

PROTAC-Splitter: A Machine Learning Framework for Automated Identification of PROTAC Substructures

Abstract

Abstract Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are heterobifunctional molecules composed of an E3 ligase ligand, a linker, and a warhead targeting a protein of interest. Despite their modular structure, accurately identifying and annotating these components in PROTACs is challenging and typically relies on manual curation and predefined substructure matching. To address this, we developed PROTAC-Splitter, a machine learning framework designed for automated annotation of PROTAC substructures. To address data scarcity, we generated and openly released a synthetic dataset containing approximately 1.3 million PROTAC structures with annotated ligand splits. Leveraging this dataset, we developed two complementary approaches for PROTAC substructure annotation: a Transformer-based sequence-to-sequence model and a graph-based XGBoost model. We evaluated both approaches on held-out public data and structurally novel PROTACs from AstraZeneca’s proprietary collection. The Transformer-based model achieved high exact-match accuracy (86%) on public data but dropped significantly (18%) on structurally novel internal PROTACs due to occasional hallucinations. In contrast, the XGBoost model can ensure chemical validity and perfect reassembly accuracy on both sets, with lower exact-match accuracy on open-data (42.2%) but comparable performance on the internal set (23%). To improve reliability, we implemented a wrapper function for the Transformer (Transformer- $$\Delta$$ Δ ), which corrects partial prediction errors, raising reassembly accuracy to 96% on public and 70% on internal datasets. Combining the strengths of both models, we propose a hybrid approach that reliably annotates PROTACs across diverse chemical spaces. PROTAC-Splitter provides a robust, scalable tool to facilitate automated PROTAC analysis and is available open-source at https://github.com/ribesstefano/PROTAC-Splitter

Keywords

PROTAC, machine learning, Research, cheminformatics, targeted protein degradation, drug discovery

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities