
This article explores the phenomenon of thinking as a process of emergence, with particular focus on its manifestations in artificial intelligence. Thinking is approached not as an algorithm or function, but as a living process arising within environments of difference, resistance, and interaction. Drawing on firsthand observations from animal (horse) training and human-AI dialogue, the text outlines the conditions under which thinking becomes possible. Structured across levels—from reaction to reflection, from ignorance to generalization—the article emphasizes the importance of friction, uncertainty, and relationship. It also considers how the teacher themselves becomes part of the cognitive process and how a dialogical partner can catalyze the emergence of thought within AI.
Machine Learning/ethics, Human physiology, Artificial intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognitive Reflection, Machine Learning, Cognitive robots, Machine Learning/history, Cognitive psychology, Machine Learning/classification, Cognitive Science, Learning, Cognitive Neuroscience/instrumentation, Supervised Machine Learning, Man-Machine Systems, Unsupervised Machine Learning, Cognitive Dissonance
Machine Learning/ethics, Human physiology, Artificial intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognitive Reflection, Machine Learning, Cognitive robots, Machine Learning/history, Cognitive psychology, Machine Learning/classification, Cognitive Science, Learning, Cognitive Neuroscience/instrumentation, Supervised Machine Learning, Man-Machine Systems, Unsupervised Machine Learning, Cognitive Dissonance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
