Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

HOW AI-POWERED LEGAL TECH IS TRANSFORMING BUSINESS LAW PRACTICES AND CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS

Authors: Mbonigaba Celestin, Mbonigaba Callixte, Innocent Wits and Lillian Lydia Lebone Mtimane;

HOW AI-POWERED LEGAL TECH IS TRANSFORMING BUSINESS LAW PRACTICES AND CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal technology is transforming business law practices, particularly in contract negotiations and dispute resolution. This study examines the impact of AI-powered legal tech on efficiency, accuracy, and compliance in business law. The research utilizes a qualitative approach, analyzing secondary data sources, including legal reports, case studies, and empirical studies from 2020 to 2024. Findings indicate that AI-powered contract review tools have reduced contract processing time by 50%, with a statistically significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.97) between AI adoption and legal efficiency. Additionally, AI-driven legal analytics improve risk assessment accuracy, increasing predictive litigation accuracy from 65% in 2020 to 80% in 2024. Regression analysis reveals that investment in AI-powered legal technology strongly correlates with AI adoption growth (r = 0.99), highlighting the increasing reliance on AI tools. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including regulatory concerns, algorithmic biases, and data privacy risks. The study recommends establishing comprehensive legal frameworks to regulate AI-driven legal processes, enhancing transparency in AI decision-making, and promoting ethical AI practices. Future research should explore AI’s role in standardizing contract negotiations across jurisdictions while mitigating ethical and compliance risks.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average