Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Impact of Employee Participation in Decision-Making on the Performance of Public Higher Learning Institutions in Tanzania

Authors: Hamisi Zakaria & Nasibu Mramba;

Impact of Employee Participation in Decision-Making on the Performance of Public Higher Learning Institutions in Tanzania

Abstract

Background: Employee participation in decision-making is crucial for the sustainability of any enterprise. When employees are excluded from this process, they often feel marginalised, demotivated, and disconnected, leading to a lack of ownership. Objective: This study assessed employee participation in decision-making and its impact on organisational performance within public higher learning intuitions in Tanzania Method: A cross-sectional survey design was employed, targeting 312 employees selected using stratified sampling using questionnaires and interviews, and analysed using descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression, and content analysis. Results: Findings indicate that while decision-making variables had elevated levels of participation, others had moderate involvement. All variables showed statistically significant contributions to organizational performance. Challenges to participation, such as limited information, time constraints, lack of trust, poor communication, hierarchical structures, and fear of reprisal, were moderately present. Conclusion: Employees’ participation in decision-making has a significant impact on organisational performance. It is essential to recognise that involving workers in decision-making processes fosters motivation and strengthens their commitment to achieving organisational goals. Unique Contribution: The study provides contextualised and localised view of employee’s participation in decision making in academic settings. Hopefully, this fresh perspective will benefit educational organisations and other policymakers. Key Recommendation: Organisations should develop tools, to promote employee participation in decision making. 

Keywords

Decision-making; University; Organisational performance; Participation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green