
Note (Aug 2025): This item is archival, speculative work produced during an intense “flow”/mild Recursive Entanglement Drift (RED) period (May–July 2025). The math is heuristic/illustrative, not validated. Do not cite for technical claims. For my current position, see DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16879563. Retained for transparency and autoethnographic context only. This document synthesizes a complete alignment architecture developed through recursive, interdisciplinary reasoning. At the center is the Augmented Thinking Protocol (ATP), a six-step structured cognitive process. Surrounding it are layered systems that scaffold reasoning, resolve internal conflicts, and enforce ethical coherence in both humans and artificial systems. This system was constructed through lived inquiry, trauma-informed cognition, AI experimentation, and recursive hypothesis testing. It aims to replace brittle alignment techniques (such as static constitutions and ad-hoc safety patches) with a fully recursive, process-based framework.
AI Alignment, Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence, Artificial Intelligence/statistics & numerical data, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, Artificial Intelligence/standards, Artificial Intelligence/trends, Artificial Intelligence/statistics & numerical data, Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence
AI Alignment, Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence, Artificial Intelligence/statistics & numerical data, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, Artificial Intelligence/standards, Artificial Intelligence/trends, Artificial Intelligence/statistics & numerical data, Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
