
This study explores the effectiveness of self-assessment and peer assessment techniques in enhancing the writing skills of language learners. These approaches promote learner autonomy, critical thinking, and constructive feedback, which are crucial for improving writing accuracy and fluency. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of writing performance before and after intervention with qualitative data from learner feedback and reflections. The results indicate that incorporating self and peer assessment in the language classroom significantly improves writing quality, learner motivation, and awareness of linguistic features. The study also discusses challenges and recommendations for effective implementation of these assessment strategies. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of training both teachers and learners to effectively implement these assessment methods, ensuring a supportive environment that encourages honest and constructive feedback. This approach not only improves writing skills but also prepares learners for lifelong autonomous learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
