Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Using Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate and Grade Peer Interactions in MOOCs.

Authors: Juan, Camilo Montoya; Ana, Paula Gómez;

Using Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate and Grade Peer Interactions in MOOCs.

Abstract

After more than a decade, MOOCs have shown great promise in delivering high-quality, affordable education at scale, breaking down geographical and financial barriers. Yet, they continue to face persistently low completion rates, limiting their impact. Contributing factors include limited learner accountability, weak engagement mechanisms, high perceived time demands, and scarce opportunities for meaningful peer interaction. Addressing these challenges in a cost-effective way remains a major hurdle. This lightning talk introduces an innovative approach to improving MOOC engagement and completion. We present a self-service web interface that simplifies scheduling and coordination of small-group, real-time discussion sessions. This tool is complemented by an advanced AI engine that facilitates these sessions, keeping discussions on track and aligned with learning goals. The AI also provides structured, rubric-based assessments of learner engagement.Pilot tests of this approach have yielded promising results. Participation in live sessions has increased significantly, reflecting greater motivation and accountability. Learners report deeper, more meaningful interactions, driven by structured facilitation and active peer-to-peer engagement enabled by the AI. Additionally, the AI generates personalized formative feedback based on individual contributions, enhancing the learning experience and addressing diverse learner needs at scale.By integrating scalable, AI-facilitated human interactions, this approach offers a powerful way to revitalize MOOCs. It makes online learning more interactive, inclusive, and engaging—supporting global learner communities and positioning MOOCs to reclaim their role as a transformative force in education.

Keywords

Peer Learning, Real-time Group Discussion, Artificial Intelligence in Education, AI Assessment, MOOC Completion Rates

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green