Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Analysis of Aerobic Capacity (Vo2max) Between University-Level Judo and Football Players

Authors: SINGH, Sagar; HUSAIN, Rabiya; SHAW, Dhananjoy;

Comparative Analysis of Aerobic Capacity (Vo2max) Between University-Level Judo and Football Players

Abstract

Aerobic capacity, measured by VO2max, is a key indicator of cardiovascular efficiency and endurance, essential for athletic performance. Football primarily involves sustained aerobic activity, whereas judo combines aerobic demands with high-intensity anaerobic bursts. This study aimed to compare VO2 max levels between university-level football and judo players, highlighting differences in cardiovascular endurance across these sports. A total of 60 male athletes (football = 30; judo = 30) from the University of Delhi participated in the study. All participants were aged between 18 to 24 years and had participated at the inter-university level. VO2 max was estimated using the Cooper 12-Minute Run Test. Descriptive statistics and a t-test were conducted to compare the groups. The analysis revealed that football players exhibited significantly higher VO2max values compared to judo players (p < 0.05). This finding aligns with the distinct physiological requirements of the sports: football demands prolonged aerobic activity, while judo emphasizes intermittent anaerobic effort with recovery phases predominated by muscular endurance. This study highlights significant differences in VO2max between football and judo players, with football players demonstrating superior aerobic capacity. The findings emphasize the importance of sport-specific demands in evaluating cardiovascular endurance and offer insights for optimizing training programs for different athletic disciplines. 

Keywords

Football, Judo, VO2Max, Aerobic Capacity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!