
There are numerous benefits to the advancement of predictive justice for the efficient functioning of the legal system. The application of predictive algorithmic models can improve legal certainty by incentivizing judges to base their decisions on earlier decisions. Apart from standardizing the way the law is applied, it can also assist stakeholders in making informed decisions before a court case, encourage timely case resolution, referrals for sentencing, out-of-court settlements, and prioritize cases where violations seem likely. The challenge is creating a system that maintains fair procedure while simultaneously addressing the concerns of those impacted by this automated justice system. This necessitates a strong policy that lays out the guidelines for predictive justice in court cases and puts the necessary protections in place. Judicial reforms that integrate the work of the central government through the Ministry of Law and Justice with the judiciary should enable predictive justice.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
