
The Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp (KMSKA) conducted a pilot project with the AI software eScriptorium to investigate how historical auction catalogues with handwritten notes could be digitally accessed. This included 65 digitized catalogues and focused on two processes: transcription and segmentation. Transcription converts printed and handwritten texts into machine-readable text. Initially, we used a model trained on 19th-century French. This worked reasonably well for printed texts, but failed for handwritten texts. With trial and error, we arrived at a third model based only on the essential types of data: lot number; artist name; artwork title; purchaser and price. This model proved more efficient for both printed and handwritten text. Segmentation is based on page layout analysis and aims to identify the different elements of a page, in our case the same five types of data. To do this, we linked text in the segments to a category of data. Initially, we used the so-called ‘regions’ in eScriptorium to assign the categories manually, but this led to poor performance. An alternative with ‘baseline’ categorization gave better results and was therefore used. A Python script then converted the output of eScriptorium to a structured Excel file. Further development of the project can focus on refining the transcription and segmentation models for more accurate processing and categorization of printed and handwritten text. A collaboration with the Getty Research Institute offers opportunities for knowledge sharing and integration of the digitized auction catalogues as linked open data, increasing their impact and accessibility.
Network Day 2025
Network Day 2025
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
