Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Predicting the Tendency Toward Open Science in Flemish Research Projects

Authors: Pham, Hoang-Son; Ali-Eldin, Amr;

Predicting the Tendency Toward Open Science in Flemish Research Projects

Abstract

In recent years, Open Science has emerged as a pivotal element in research and innovation policies at various levels, advocating for immediate and unrestricted access to publicly funded scientific research outcomes. While the benefits of open access to research are recognized, measuring its extent poses a challenge. This paper presents a novel machine learning-based approach to assess and predict the level of open-access support within research projects. By analyzing key indicators such as publication practices, funding sources, research disciplines, and interdisciplinarity, we develop predictive models that identify patterns and trends in open-access adoption. Our analysis, applied to Flemish research projects from the FRIS portal, reveals strong links between open-access publication activity and the broader adoption of open-access principles in research projects. The models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with results highlighting the effectiveness of classical machine learning techniques over deep learning approaches. In addition, we explored advanced machine learning techniques such as ChatGPT and LLaMA, which offer significant improvements in natural language processing and predictive capabilities. These techniques enhance our ability to analyze complex datasets and generate more accurate predictions regarding open-access support. Future work will focus on extending our predictive models to other research outcomes. This will enable a more comprehensive understanding of open-access support across various dimensions of scientific research. This work provides actionable insights for researchers, data stewards, policymakers, funders, and project managers, supporting evidence-based strategies to foster and evaluate open-access practices, thereby advancing the goals of Open Science.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Network Day 2025

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average