Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance of Upstream Oil and Gas Companies in South - South of Nigeria

Authors: Boo, Michael Jones; Oladejo, Olusola James;

Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance of Upstream Oil and Gas Companies in South - South of Nigeria

Abstract

The Nigerian economy heavily relies on oil and gas revenue, which significantly contributes to its development. However, competition for financial performance among oil and gas companies has raised concerns among residents in the South-South region. This study examines the impact of sustainability reporting on the financial performance of six upstream oil and gas companies in South-South Nigeria, using an ex-post facto design. A total of 54 observations were drawn from nine years (2015–2023) of audited financial statements and sustainability reports sourced from company websites and the Nigerian Stock Exchange. Environmental, economic, and social reporting metrics were analyzed using content analysis based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards. Data validity was ensured through audited reports and diagnostic tests, including Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for multicollinearity and the Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity. Descriptive statistics summarized data trends, while multiple regression analysis evaluated the relationships between sustainability reporting and financial performance, with results presented through tables, charts, and graphs. The study evaluates the impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance, revealing mixed outcomes. Environmental reporting positively but insignificantly affects ROA (β = 0.138, p = 0.063), while economic reporting has a significant negative effect (β = -0.015, p < 0.01), and social reporting shows no significant impact (β = -0.187, p = 0.596). For ROE, environmental (β = 0.0177, p = 0.8709), economic (β = 0.0314, p = 0.7596), and social (β = 0.1101, p = 0.3895) reporting display positive but insignificant effects. Economic reporting significantly influences ROCE (β = 0.179, p = 0.0051), whereas environmental (β = 0.198, p = 0.113) and social reporting (β = -0.149, p = 0.303) remain insignificant. The models, while statistically significant, exhibit weak to moderate explanatory power (R²: 0.011–0.379), indicating a limited overall impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance. Economic reporting stands out as the most influential, particularly for ROCE, highlighting the importance of strategic economic disclosures. Further research into additional determinants of financial performance is recommended to deepen understanding of these relationships.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Financial performance, Sustainability reporting, Social reporting, Social reporting, Environmental reporting, Economic reporting

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green