
This article examines how artificial intelligence-based risk assessment systems enhance boththe quality and speed of financial decision-making processes. As financial institutions grapple withincreasingly dynamic markets and complex data environments, traditional risk assessment toolsstruggle to process real-time information effectively. AI systems—leveraging machine learning,natural language processing, and large language models—promise rapid, accurate risk evaluation,superior predictive insights, and operational scalability. Drawing on empirical analyses and globalcase studies, this study delves into the effectiveness of AI-driven methodologies, comparing them toconventional models in domains such as credit scoring, market volatility prediction, and frauddetection. It further considers associated risks including algorithmic bias, data privacy, modeltransparency, and systemic vulnerability due to widespread use of similar AI systemsft.com+7flagright.com+7ijrpr.com+7. Results highlight that while AI systems significantly improvedecision speed and accuracy, they require robust data infrastructure, comprehensive governanceframeworks, and explainability mechanisms to ensure ethical and resilient deployment. This articleconcludes with policy recommendations aimed at optimizing financial AI systems, balancinginnovation with oversight
credit scoring, Artificial intelligence, machine learning, fraud detection, risk assessment
credit scoring, Artificial intelligence, machine learning, fraud detection, risk assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
