Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Spatially-distributed narratives: Generative Ambiguity in Heritage Visualisation

Authors: Wehmeier, Colter; Artopoulos, Georgios;

Spatially-distributed narratives: Generative Ambiguity in Heritage Visualisation

Abstract

Presentation: DARIAH AE25: Digital Storytelling Session – Nicosia International Airport VE Project Executive Abstract (see Extended Abstract) Drawing on research at the intersection of immersive technologies, architectural history, digital humanities, and participatory heritage, this paper explores the conditions under which representational ambiguity can enhance museum visitors' engagement in spatial interpretation and knowledge elicitation. In digital cultural heritage and architectural representation, the tension between objectivity and ambiguity fosters rich opportunities for wider interpretive engagement through interaction and reflection. Yet contemporary digital visualization approaches in cultural heritage increasingly prioritize photorealism as a means of conveying higher levels of accuracy in heritage representation. This paper argues that this practice may hinder a deeper cognitive engagement of museum visitors and heritage communities, particularly when the goal of this activity is knowledge communication and exchange rather than the mere dissemination (one dimensional) of static information. The paper argues that this approach aligns virtual reconstructions of heritage with the deeper intellectual and cultural aims of the Digital Humanities. Context This repository includes the slides and presentation script from my talk at the DARIAH AE25 conference. The presentation outlines research conducted under the supervision of Dr. Georgios Artopoulos and Dr. Michael Tissenbaum, as part of my dual PhD dissertation. My participation in DARIAH AE25 had two main goals: To refine the narrative framework of the project’s contribution to digital heritage. To conduct interviews and surveys with digital humanities experts, gathering feedback on the perceived value, tensions, and disciplinary contrasts relevant to the "methodology" proposed. Both objectives were met and have significantly informed the ongoing development of my dissertation. Project website:Nicosia International Airport VEThis site includes media clips, a content upload portal, and final outputs as they become available. Note:The PDF shared here may omit minor visual elements such as GIF animations. These are non-essential to the core content. A plain text version, combining slide content and speaker notes (as exported by Google Slides), is also included for reference. —Colter Wehmeier

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities