
This study explores data-driven approaches for modeling industrial processes by employing linear and nonlinear techniques to predict output variables based on available input measurements. Linear regression-based techniques are compared with nonlinear machine learning models to evaluate their predictive capabilities. The analysis considers models trained on high-accuracy & low-frequency laboratory data alongside models leveraging low-accuracy & high-frequency sensor measurements. A hybrid methodology enhances predictive performance by integrating additional process information in the training process. Our findings show that this hybrid approach reduces the RMSE from 0.74 to 0.38 compared to models that rely solely on sensor measurements.
Machine Learning, Industrial Monitoring, Feature Selection
Machine Learning, Industrial Monitoring, Feature Selection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
