
This study explores whether reliance on generative AI leads to cognitive erosion (decline in mental effort) or cognitive extension (enhancement through support). Participants (N = 200) completed problem-solving tasks either independently or with AI assistance. Cognitive load, self-efficacy, and critical thinking were measured before and after. Results showed improved task performance with AI, but decreased metacognitive awareness and engagement. These findings suggest that frequent AI use may undermine independent thinking. The study offers early insights into how AI influences cognition, with implications for education, mental performance, and policy development in an increasingly AI-dependent world.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
