Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

How good is your metadata? A tour of the Crossref Participation Reports tool

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Presentation , Other literature type 17 Jun 2025Embargo end date: 17 Jun 2025 English Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: Clark, Rosa; Kovalyova, Maryna;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15685579 , 10.5281/zenodo.15685578

How good is your metadata? A tour of the Crossref Participation Reports tool

Abstract

How good is your metadata? A tour of the Crossref Participation Reports toolWebinar held on 17 June 2025 This webinar introduces Crossref’s Participation Reports tool—a free service that helps members evaluate the quality of the metadata they deposit. The session provides a practical overview of how to use the tool, why high-quality metadata matters, and what actions can be taken to improve metadata for increased discoverability and reuse. In this session, you’ll learn: How to navigate and interpret your Participation Report The impact of comprehensive metadata on content visibility Practical tips for improving your metadata records

Related Organizations
Keywords

metadata, scholarly publishing, crossref

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green