Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

UruDendro2, a public dataset of 53 cross-section images and manual annual ring delineations of Pinus taeda L.

Authors: Marichal, Henry; Verónica, Casaravilla; Ludmila, Profumo; Christine, Lucas; Diego, Passarella; Gregory, Randal;

UruDendro2, a public dataset of 53 cross-section images and manual annual ring delineations of Pinus taeda L.

Abstract

If you use this dataset please cite the DeepCS-TRD manuscript. Method Image and annotations can be inspected using the TRAS tool developed during the project. 1) Open TRAS 2) Open Image 3) File>Load Annotations Harvest Site The samples were collected in Curticeiras, Department of Rivera, Uruguay, during 2022 (18 samples) and 2023 (35 samples) as part of a harvesting operation managed by a local lumber company. The sampling locations correspond to the following coordinates: 31°17'45" S, 55°41'42" W; 31°10'4" S, 55°39'42" W (18 samples); and 31°01'11.37" S, 55°31'55.81" W (35 samples). In total, 53 cross-section samples were obtained. The site is classified under the CONEAT 7.31 group and is characterized by being located on the Tacuarembó Sandstone geological formation. It presents slopes ranging from 6% to 10%, very good drainage, and deep soils reaching up to 180–200 cm in the B horizon. Image Acquisition The UruDendro1 collection was expanded with 53 new images captured under laboratory conditions using an iPhone 6S (12 MP RGB sensor) positioned at a distance of 43 to 51 cm from the wood cross-section, and illuminated with a 35 W LED ring light. The surface preparation of the samples varied: some were cut using a chainsaw, others were smoothed with a handheld planer, and several were further polished with a rotary sander. All images were acquired indoors. The image widths range from a minimum of 2267 pixels to a maximum of 3024 pixels. Sample codes follow the structure: XY Where X denotes the diameter class to which the disc belongs (A, B, or C; see table), and Y corresponds to the sample identifier. Class A Class B Class C 35-40 cm 40.1-45 cm 45.1-50 cm Annotation Details The software tool used to generate the annotations was Labelme , which produces closed polygons defined by a set of vertices. We worked with two types of annotations:those corresponding to annual ring boundaries or earlywood–latewood boundaries, and those corresponding to reaction wood.

File structure In general, the file structure for each collection goes as follows: images/ - Folder with the image samples images_no_background/ - Folder with the images after the background has been removed annotations/– annual_rings/ - Annual ring annotations– earlywood_latewood/ - Earlywood-Latewood boundary annotations– reaction_wood/ - Reaction wood annotations pith_location.txt - file with the pith pixel location for each image Where each sample has a unique code. For example, sample F02c has five different files: images/F02c.jpg images_no_background/F02c.jpg annotations/annual_rings/F02c.json annotations/earlywood-latewood/F02c.json annotations/reaction_wood/F02c.json

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average