
This study examined the use of AI Mathematics tools to improve teaching and learning in solving parallelograms, trapezoids, and kites of Grade 9 students at Minabel Integrated School in Calayan East District, Cagayan. The main objective was to determine if the use of AI tools would enhance students' performance and classroom engagement. The study used a mixed-method design incorporating surveys, interviews, pre-tests, post-tests and classroom observations. The respondents included both teachers and their students who were purposively sampled. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used in the analysis. The results showed that the use of tools like Cici, Photomath, and ChatGPT enhanced students’ problem-solving skills, motivation and conceptual understanding. Further, teachers observed an increase in student engagement and ability to use AI tools to improve their instruction but needed a training in AI technology. Lastly, the use of AI tools can improve math instruction if used correctly. Thus, implementing a professional development focusing on practice with AI tools to reduce knowledge and skills gaps, training students on the responsible use of it, investing infrastructure and ethical policy development must be created. Moreover, the findings proposed project A.I.M. which promotes equity access to support AI practice for digital literacy in the curriculum.
AI Powered Tools, Mathematics Education, Mathematics AI tools, Intervention plan
AI Powered Tools, Mathematics Education, Mathematics AI tools, Intervention plan
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
