Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Exploring Human-AI Interaction: A Systematic Review of Trust, Ethics, and Adoption in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Authors: Rabi, Jason Isaac III A.;

Exploring Human-AI Interaction: A Systematic Review of Trust, Ethics, and Adoption in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Abstract

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping the landscape of human communication through advances in natural language processing (NLP), speech recognition, and conversational interfaces. This paper critically examines the dual impact of AI on both interpersonal and human-machine communication, emphasizing the balance between innovation and its ethical, psychological, and social implications. Drawing from an extensive review of scholarly literature, the study identifies key themes such as human-AI collaboration, the role of trust and transparency, ethical responsibility, cognitive dissonance, and the evolving dynamics of social interaction in AI-mediated contexts. The paper explores how AI systems influence user perception, emotional engagement, and identity formation, while also raising concerns about manipulation, overreliance, and authenticity in communication. It highlights the importance of integrating ethical design principles—such as fairness, accountability, and inclusivity—into the development of AI communication tools. The study concludes by proposing guidelines for creating AI systems that support and enrich human discourse while safeguarding psychological well-being and social cohesion. This work contributes to a growing body of interdisciplinary research that seeks to understand and guide the responsible evolution of AI in communication. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, human-AI communication, natural language processing, ethics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green