
This presentation is one of the two early engagement events organized with users (experienced researchers and ECRs in Law, Criminology and Psychology) and stakeholders (in Poland and the UK) to agree on a coding scheme for encoding judicial decision data in the first and second instance courts that will enable both re-evaluation of past research findings and examination of new research questions, which can provide a valid, reliable and generalizable evidence-base for judicial decision policy-making and practice.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
