Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Managing Diversity in Smaller European Businesses: Employee perspectives

Authors: Kiverä, Olli Aaron; Šilenskytė, Aušrinė; Delecour, Tiphaine;

Managing Diversity in Smaller European Businesses: Employee perspectives

Abstract

How inclusive are workplaces in Europe today and for whom? This report presents findings from a 2024 cross-national survey examining perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) across Austria, Finland, Germany, and Lithuania. With 304 respondents primarily working in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), this report explores how DEI is embedded in day-to-day work experiences. Despite growing awareness of DEI as a priority, the results reveal inconsistencies between countries, identity groups, and policies & practices. While some companies by respondents were seen as legally compliant, this did not always transform in advanced DEI policies, and in fact significant number of employers across all countries were considering companies to be unaware of basic DEI obligations. Lack of dedicated personnel, accountability structures, or mechanisms to monitor diversity outcomes was widespread and contributed to the disconnection between DEI efforts and the everyday reality of employees. Bias and barriers were reported across key stages of employment. No single country companies were considered to have inclusive practices across all identity groups, and marginalized individuals consistently reported reduced access to development, recognition, or advancement. DEI training and mentoring were rare, and leadership remained less diverse than general staff roles. Despite this, over half of respondents felt free to express their identity at work, indicating resilience, but highlighting the complex, uneven nature of inclusion. Equity measures such as quotas or blind recruitment were seldom used. Instead, organizations, according to respondents, favoured general support policies, which do not necessarily address the deeper structural inequities identified in the data. Many employees were unaware of any DEI measures at all, suggesting that even well-intended efforts often fail to engage or impact those they are designed to support. Taken together, the findings challenge the notion that DEI can be managed through broad, universal policies. They underscore the need for visible, identity-specific, and measurable DEI strategies particularly in SMEs, where flexible structures offer unique opportunities for inclusiveness. This report offers an overview of the current gaps and a roadmap for including diversity, equity, and inclusion into the core of organizational activities. By utilizing observed experiences of the employees working in the European firms in target countries, this report provides specific recommendations for managers, especially those leading smaller firms.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Europe, equity, employees, inclusion, small business, under-represented groups, SME, DEI, EU, social sustainability, diversity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities