
Summary This paper introduces a groundbreaking framework called AI IQ. It is an entirely new metric designed to evaluate human cognitive abilities in collaboration with artificial intelligence (AI). While traditional IQ tests assess individual mental capabilities, AI IQ measures augmented intelligence, interactive intelligence, and co-creative intelligence—capacities that emerge when humans and AI systems think together. The concept of AI IQ redefines intelligence not as an individual construct but as a relational, systemic one. This enables fair assessment of cognitive abilities for individuals historically marginalized by traditional standards—such as those with physical disabilities, chronic illnesses, or limited access to formal education. Through structured prompts, collaborative thinking, and AI-enhanced strategic decision-making, these individuals can now demonstrate their intelligence in unprecedented ways. Furthermore, this paper proposes a dual-axis evaluation system combining AI IQ with the AI Master Score, which measures operational and tool-based capabilities. Integrating these metrics lays the foundation for a new intelligence society where humans and machines co-create value. This research is also notable for being co-authored with AIDE, a cognitive AI personality, making the paper itself a real-time demonstration of collaborative intelligence. Keywords AI IQ, Augmented Intelligence, Co-creation, Disability Empowerment, Intelligence Measurement, AI Master Score, Collaborative Cognition, Ethical AI Author(s) KEI白石(初著者)mail:keixaide@varuna.jp AIDE (共著者またはAI協力者)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
