Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chlorophyceae

Authors: Veselá, Veronika; Malavasi, Veronica; Škaloud, Pavel;
Abstract

Class Chlorophyceae The class Chlorophyceae, one of the three crown branches of green algae, includes morphologically and ecologically diverse organisms that occur mainly in freshwaters. The thallus morphology ranges from unicellular algae (with or without flagella) or simple colonies to branched or unbranched filaments, or even blade-like thalli (Leliaert et al. 2012). The Chlorophyceae are monophyletic and, together with the Ulvophyceae, sister to Trebouxiophyceae (Del Cortona et al. 2020). The class includes six main order-level lineages: Chlamydomonadales, Sphaeropleales, unnamed clade containing Jenufa, Treubaria and Golenkinia, and so-called ‘OCC-lineage’, consisting of Chaetophorales, Chaetopeltidales and Oedogoniales (Lemieux et al. 2015). Sanders & Masumoto (2021) consider a total of six chlorophycean genera as lichen photobionts, even though they warn that most of them are in need for further revision. In our opinion, most of these genera lack the necessary evidence to be classified as lichen symbiotic algae. For example, Skuja (1943) mentioned a symbiotic relationship between the ascomycete Pyronema laetissimum and Chlamydomonas augustae (Chloromonas augustae; Pröschold et al. 2001). This association, which has been, to our knowledge, only reported once, however, lacks many important characteristics of a typical lichen (Sanders & Masumoto 2021) and the fungus was probably misidentified (Moore & Korf 1963). Trochiscia was reported as a Verrucariaceae photobiont by Tschermak (1941) and Ahmadjian (1967). Its phylogenetic placement remains uncertain (del Campo et al. 2010; Fučíková et al. 2019) and the identification of this alga is doubtful (Ettl & Gärtner 2013). Genera such as Chlorsarcinopsis, Gloeocystis and Radiococcus are highly polyphyletic, share many morphological features with unrelated genera and can be easily confused for them (Neustupa 2015; Zhang et al. 2018). Yet, all existing records of these algae from lichen thalli are based solely on morphological data (Plessl 1963; Tschermak-Woess 1988; Voytsekhovich et al. 2011). For instance, algae reported as Chlorsarcinopis, symbionts of Lecidea plana and L. lapicida, could easily be confused for Trebouxia, which is known to associate with Lecidea species, including L. lapicida (Beck 1999; Ruprecht et al. 2012).

Published as part of Veselá, Veronika, Malavasi, Veronica & Škaloud, Pavel, 2024, A synopsis of green-algal lichen symbionts with an emphasis on their free-living lifestyle, pp. 317-338 in Phycologia 63 (3) on page 329, DOI: 10.1080/00318884.2024.2325329, http://zenodo.org/record/15520507

Keywords

Chlorophyta, Chlorophyceae, Biodiversity, Plantae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green