Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D5.3 - Final recommendations on implementing and exposing FAIR assessment for data and code

Authors: Hugo, Wim; Ulrich, Robert; L'Hours, Hervé; Parkes, Oliver; Davidson, Joy; Ramezani, Parham;

D5.3 - Final recommendations on implementing and exposing FAIR assessment for data and code

Abstract

Task 5.4 in FAIR-IMPACT had the objective of developing guidelines in respect of the sharing of repository attributes for a number of purposes, including sharing information on the characteristics of a repository, assisting end users with selection of repositories, or validation of such repository attributes. A special focus of this general set of guidelines were exposure of FAIR attributes of trustworthy repositories. Claims in respect of trustworthiness of a repository and its certification as such, and of FAIR compliance in respect of the objects available from a repository (aggregated to reflect the status of FAIR in the repository) are used as examples throughout the report. These are important examples of repository attributes that may require validation, but certainly not the only ones. One can validate the claims in a number of ways, but this is not in scope for the report: we are concerned with the simplest and most expedient way in which such an attribute can be exposed to machines. While this is not the primary focus of the report, a subtitle was included in naming this deliverable to clearly mark and communicate the extra content and recommendations provided to existing and aspiring trustworthy digital repositories (TDRs) with regards to implementing and exposing trustworthiness status.

Keywords

FAIR data, FAIR-IMPACT, FAIR

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!