Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ BiPrintsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
BiPrints
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: BiPrints
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Publications at Bielefeld University
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Results of the 1st Interdisciplinary NFDI Metadata Workshop, January 2025 : Can we agree on cross-disciplinary metadata standards to improve the reuse of research data?

Authors: Söding, Emanuel; Koepler, Oliver; Castro, Leyla Jael; Czerniak, Andreas; Fliegl, Heike; Grieb, Jonas; Henzen, Christin; +2 Authors

Results of the 1st Interdisciplinary NFDI Metadata Workshop, January 2025 : Can we agree on cross-disciplinary metadata standards to improve the reuse of research data?

Abstract

The German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) unites activities across all scientific disciplines to realise an overarching research data management. The interdisciplinary discussion and agreement on common standards for the description of research data, be it through metadata or terminology, is a key element for the successful implementation of FAIR data. The Task Force Metadata of the NFDI section “(Meta)data, Terminologies, Provenance” aims to moderate and coordinate the process of identifying and evaluating existing cross-disciplinary terminologies and metadata schemas as suitable candidates for NFDI-agreed recommendations. The Task Force takes its motivation from the NFDI goals and the strategy of 2025/26 to develop cross-disciplinary metadata standards for the comprehensive (re-)usability of research data. With this vision in mind, the Task Force organised a two-day interactive NFDI Metadata Workshop at the Open Science Lab of TU Dresden to identify and evaluate suitable existing generic metadata schemas and recommendations on how to apply these in the disciplines represented by the NFDI. Altogether 46 participants from 26 NFDI consortia discussed common metadata schemas, disciplinary needs, and standardization approaches. Key sessions included expert talks from NFDI, re3data and EOSC, an overview of institutional processes for metadata standardization. In a preliminary landscape analysis the Task Force had identified DCAT, DataCite, and schema.org as three established and commonly applied metadata schemas to be discussed as potential candidates for NFDI-wide recommendations from the perspectives of the 26 NFDI communities. A World Café session facilitated discussions across disciplines about the utilization of the aforementioned metadata schema, , and the adoption of re3data for repository registration. The workshop also addressed questions about how repositories related to the NFDI can be represented in re3data in the future, including recommendation for registration and updating metadata of such repositories. In this presentation we will summarise the results of the workshop and give an outlook on how this dialogue can be continued towards an NFDI recommendation on a portfolio of cross-disciplinary metadata standards for research data.

Keywords

NFDI, 020, Metadata, Core Profile, DCAT, DataCite, schema.org, re3data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green