
This paper assesses the role of different organizational performance appraisal techniques in reference to employee engagement in contemporary firms. The research intends to analyze the motivational impacts of directed performance evaluations, like 360-degree feedback and continuous monitoring on commitment from the employees. The study employs qualitative methods through literature and theoretical analysis, drawing on the JD-R model alongside Self-Determination Theory and Organizational Justice Theory. Results indicate that active participation and provision of feedback within performance systems markedly increase engagement, whereas punitive evaluations without constructive feedback led to disengagement and attrition. The paper revolves around the developmental evaluation approach and the culture of engagement within the organization.
Organizational Justice, Performance Evaluation, Leadership Style, 360-Degree Feedback, Management by Objectives (MBO), Continuous Feedback, Human Resource Management, Employee Engagement
Organizational Justice, Performance Evaluation, Leadership Style, 360-Degree Feedback, Management by Objectives (MBO), Continuous Feedback, Human Resource Management, Employee Engagement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
