Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Formalizing the Multifaceted Object "o": A Unified Framework for Integrating Heterogeneous Representations, Ideas, Concepts, and Object-Oriented Principles

Authors: Usai, Luigi;

Formalizing the Multifaceted Object "o": A Unified Framework for Integrating Heterogeneous Representations, Ideas, Concepts, and Object-Oriented Principles

Abstract

This paper introduces and formalizes the concept of a "multifaceted object," denoted as "o". This object "o" is hypothesized to exist simultaneously as a physical or imaginary entity, a collection of semantic, semiotic, and pragmatic significations—explicitly encompassing ideas and concepts themselves—a digital representation (e.g., a Blender file), and various matricial forms (e.g., an image, a pixel matrix). The author posits that human reasoning involves the manipulation of these "o" objects as fundamental units of thought, equivalent to ideas and concepts. The primary challenge addressed is the rigorous scientific and mathematical definition of such an entity, which inherently bridges physical, abstract-semantic (including conceptual/ideational), and digital-numerical ontological levels. The paper refines the definition of "o" by delineating its core facets: Matricial (M), Semantic (S, incorporating ideas/concepts), Visual/Image (I), and Further Aspects (X), which include physical, digital-representational (e.g., a Blender file encoding a 3D model), and pragmatic dimensions. Methodologically, a multi-pronged approach for formalization is proposed, leveraging Sheaf Theory for local-global coherence, Category Theory for high-level structural relationships, Hybrid Algebraic Structures for concrete state-space definitions and inter-modal operators, and Multimodal Type Theory for a logically consistent constructive framework. Furthermore, the principles of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) are integrated to provide a complementary perspective on the structure and behavior of "o". From these formalisms, a typology of rules—mathematical, semiotic, linguistic, matricial, and digital-representational—is derived. These rules govern the intra-aspect properties and, crucially, the inter-aspect relationships of "o", including transformations inherent in reasoning processes. The paper also discusses advanced considerations such as temporal dynamics, learning mechanisms, cross-modal coherence, and the ontological status of "o" as a potential unit of mentalese (the language of thought). The implications of this framework are suggested to be potentially transformative for fields like Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly in areas of multimodal systems and conceptual reasoning, Cognitive Science, in modeling information integration and concept manipulation, and the Philosophy of Mind and Science, by offering a formal approach to ideas, representation, and meaning.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average