Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Emotionally Intelligent Machines: How Cognitive-Affective Algorithms Influence User Decision-Making on Digital Platforms

Authors: ALAM, MDSHOFIUL;

Emotionally Intelligent Machines: How Cognitive-Affective Algorithms Influence User Decision-Making on Digital Platforms

Abstract

This paper examines how cognitive-affective algorithms—advanced AI systems that interpret both emotional and cognitive user data—are transforming digital platforms into powerful engines of behavioral influence. By combining technologies such as multimodal machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and deep reinforcement learning, these systems analyze real-time emotional cues and behavioral signals to optimize content delivery, user engagement, and decision outcomes. The study outlines the core mechanisms behind these algorithms, including emotional reinforcement loops and personalized content funnels, and explores their application across consumer behavior, political microtargeting, and social identity shaping. It also highlights pressing ethical concerns such as diminished user autonomy, invisible emotional manipulation, and the disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations like adolescents. Key regulatory and design recommendations include transparency mandates, algorithmic audits, emotional firewalls, digital literacy programs, and opt-out mechanisms for affective profiling. The paper concludes that cognitive-affective algorithms are not merely personalization tools—they are behavioral architects operating at scale. A multi-disciplinary response is essential to ensure that these systems serve humanity’s psychological well-being, democratic integrity, and digital rights.

Keywords

Cognitive AI, Affective Computing, Social Media Algorithms, AI and Society,, Behavioral Influence, Emotional Algorithms, Algorithmic Manipulation,

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green