Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lab Calibrations of MOS Gas Sensors: Dataset to Investigate Drift Compensation

Authors: Arendes, Dennis; Amann, Johannes Felix; Schütze, Andreas; Bur, Christian;

Lab Calibrations of MOS Gas Sensors: Dataset to Investigate Drift Compensation

Abstract

This dataset was created at the Lab for Measurement Technology (Saarland University). The dataset contains data of two lab calibrations with one year in between of two resistive-type metal oxide semiconductor (MOS, also known as MOX or SMOX) gas sensors, i.e. multipixel sensor SGP40, Sensirion AG, Switzerland, each comprising four gas sensitive layers (pixels). The purpose of the dataset is to study drift effects and drift compensation strategies of MOS sensors. The sensors are run in temperature cycled operation (TCO) (DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102559-8.00012-4). The measured sensor data is proportional to logarithmic conductance and provided together with a time stamp in Unix Time as well as the set temperature of the micro-hotplates. Additionally, for each temperature cycle the gas concentration set points in parts-per-billion (ppb) from the calibration in a custom-built Gas Mixing Apparatus (GMA) (DOI: 10.1515/teme-2023-0075) are provided as target values (labels). The temperature cycle (applied to all pixels) consists of 24 steps, with a total length of 144 s and a sample rate of 10 Hz, resulting in 1440 datapoints per cycle (i.e. number of columns in the sensor data struct). The cycle starts at 400 °C for 5 s, after which a lower temperature is set for 7 s. After each low temperature, another 400 °C step is set for 5 s. The lower temperatures range from 100 °C to 375 °C, increasing by 25 °C with each step. A picture of the cycle is added to the dataset. The entire dataset is divided into two laboratory calibrations. In between a field test was performed over more than one year in a normal office room (12.04.2023 - 02.05.2024), which lead to aging of the sensors. The purpose of the second calibration is to allow drift compensation (DOI: 10.3390/atmos12050647). The chronological sequence and time periods of the measurements are as follows: First lab calibration: 06.04.2023 - 11.04.2023 Second lab calibration: 03.05.2024 - 07.05.2024 Both calibrations consists of 200 randomised Unique Gas Mixtures (UGMs) (DOI: 10.5194/jsss-9-411-2020), each UGM is a mixture of substances inside the given boundaries, with a duration of 20 minutes. In between two UGMs, the GMA flushes the previous state and sets the new one. Since the exact concentrations are not in a steady state, those sensor cycles are marked invalid for evaluation and are marked with NaN in the target vectors. During the first calibration, the GMA generated mixtures of the following substances: Acetone, Carbon Monoxide, Ethanol, Ethyl acetate, Formaldehyde, Hydrogen, Toluene, Humidity. The concentration ranges for the different substances are given below, each mixture is unique in its composition. To avoid unwanted correlations Latin Hypercube Sampling was used, where the concentrations are linearly distributed between the given boundaries and independent of each other (DOI: 10.3390/atmos13101614). During the second calibration, the same gases were present, except for Carbon Monoxide and Ethyl Acetate. The remaining gases have the same concentration ranges as before. For the rel. humidity the maximum value is set to 75% RH, instead of 70% RH. All concentration borders are listed in the table below: First Calibration Second Calibration Substance Min. Max. Min. Max. Acetone 1 ppb 300 ppb 1 ppb 300 ppb Carbon monoxide 100 ppb 2000 ppb / / Ethanol 1 ppb 300 ppb 1 ppb 300 ppb Ethyl acetate 1 ppb 300 ppb / / Formaldehyde 1 ppb 300 ppb 1 ppb 300 ppb Hydrogen 400 ppb 1900 ppb 400 ppb 1900 ppb Toluene 1 ppb 300 ppb 1 ppb 300 ppb Rel. Humidity @20 °C 25% RH 70% RH 25% RH 75% RH Dataset:The Matlab mat-file comprises different datasets stored in structs: sensor: Struct with data of 7 SGP40 sensors, with each SGP40 sensor beeing comprised of 4 pixels (sensor0 - sensor3). Each sensor pixel is described by a matrix (A x B), where A represents the number of recorded cycles (observations) and B the number of datapoints (144 s cycle with 10 Hz Samplerate, i.e., 1440 data points) within each cycle. The depicted sensor name is the unique ID of each sensor. target: Struct with gas concentrations for every cycle and sensor. NaN values are set for invalid cycles (e.g. GMA has not reached steady state between two mixtures). gases: Concentration in ppb water: Relative humidity in %RH @20 °C states: UGM variable, indicating which cycle belongs to which UGM. Allowing the user to make groupbased training/validation/test based on UGMs instead of obervations alone. time: Struct with the time data. Time is stored in unix time and in Matlab datetime format. The time represents the starting time of each cycle.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average