
Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) and their accompanying metadata play a crucial role in effective research data management and the realization of FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). The PID4NFDI coordination hub is dedicated to creating a sustainable, scalable, and community-driven framework for metadata interoperability across the NFDI landscape. This initiative seeks to harmonize metadata practices, enhance metadata quality and completeness, and ultimately improve the discoverability of research outputs. In this talk, we will share actionable insights derived from recent metadata assessments using metrics from DataCite’s DOI metadata records, complemented by key findings from our survey on metadata practices within the NFDI community. These insights highlight critical factors influencing metadata quality and researcher engagement. Drawing from real-world examples, we demonstrate how comprehensive metadata, including bibliographic information and provenance details, supports the discoverability, reusability, and longterm sustainability of research outputs. Additionally, we outline upcoming initiatives within PID4NFDI to address identified metadata needs, emphasizing the critical role of PID service providers in improving metadata management practices. By highlighting strengths and pinpointing gaps in current metadata practices among NFDI consortia, we offer targeted recommendations that inform strategic decision-making and enhance organizational metadata workflows.Our collaborative approach aims to reduce administrative burdens, raise awareness among researchers and infrastructure providers about the importance of highquality metadata, and foster a unified metadata ecosystem, ultimately enhancing the value and impact of research data.
FAIR Principles, Persistent Identifiers, Sustainability, Metadata Quality, Metadata Interoperability, DataCite, Metadata Assessment, PID4NFDI
FAIR Principles, Persistent Identifiers, Sustainability, Metadata Quality, Metadata Interoperability, DataCite, Metadata Assessment, PID4NFDI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
