This study investigates the application of Value Engineering (VE) to optimize the selection of buildings in educational institutions, addressing the critical need to harmonize cost, functionality, and sustainability. A systematic framework is proposed to evaluate material alternatives using qualitative parameters (aesthetics, safety, durability) and quantitative metrics, including life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) (Ahmed and Pandey 2016); (Kishk, Laing, and Pollock 2010). The research underscores how strategic material choices influence both initial project costs and the long-term performance of educational infrastructure (Construction Industry Institute, 2023). The framework follows a structured process: defining functional requirements, generating alternatives, and assessing options through weighted scoring matrices and LCCA.[40,44,47] Case studies from S&T Park (IIT Kanpur) and IIM Bodh Gaya demonstrate its practical application. For instance, comparisons of granite, Kota stone, and vitrified tiles revealed that while granite incurs higher upfront costs, its superior durability and minimal maintenance needs render it more cost-effective over a 30-year lifespan. Similarly, materials prioritizing safety (e.g., slip-resistant finishes) and sustainability (e.g., recycled content) align with institutional goals despite moderate initial premiums. Findings highlight that integrating VE into material selection enhances decision-making by prioritizing lifecycle value over short-term savings.[43] This approach not only reduces long-term operational expenses but also supports sustainable construction practices. The study concludes that adopting VE-driven frameworks enables educational institutions to achieve optimized building finishes that balance budgetary constraints with functional and environmental objectives.[5]