<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
We present a formal ethical framework grounded in constructive logic, where obligations, harm, consent, and trust are defined in terms of provability. Ethical truth arises only from demonstrable proof objects, maintained in a shared proof ledger (Π). Obligations and statuses are derived via explicit inference rules, and trust is evaluated through a procedural function based on provable history. This layer forms the foundational logic of a multi-layered ethical system designed for transparency, accountability, and reparation.
Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, Logic, Intuitionistic Logic, Models, Theoretical, Ethical Theory
Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, Logic, Intuitionistic Logic, Models, Theoretical, Ethical Theory
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |