
The article referenced data and code in a OSF project and registration (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BMQCW). The deposit includes a computational notebook in R Markdown format, which could be executed without errors and Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, and Table 2 as well as numerical statics could be recreated with the code in the notebook. The data deposit contains further files matching other tables in the article, though these are likely, at least partially, manually created and out of scope. The check was successful.
Reproducibility Review, CODECHECK, Reproduction, Lifecycle Journal, Evaluation, FOS: Medical biotechnology, OSF
Reproducibility Review, CODECHECK, Reproduction, Lifecycle Journal, Evaluation, FOS: Medical biotechnology, OSF
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
