
This white paper introduces the Theory of Generativity, a groundbreaking framework that explores reality as a recursive, generative system governed by I_max, the Maximum Information Flow Principle. Derived from first principles in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and relativity, I_max asserts that the maximum rate of information flow in any system is proportional to the product of its complexity and its efficiency. Further mathematical functions are built on top of I_max, showing how nature could follow an optimization process for I_max, and how I_max's self-referential nature can be used to create a recursive, generative system. In order to demonstrate the universality of the Theory of Generativity, the paper extends far beyond math and science, exploring diverse domains such as metaphysics, theology, AI, social science, art, and philosophy. The Theory of Generativity interprets reality as a dynamic interplay of truths and paradoxes, balancing coherence and contradiction to create wholeness. It bridges physics, computation, and philosophy, positioning observation and consciousness as emergent phenomena of the universe’s recursive optimization. A computational model of spacetime and physics is proposed. However, "computation" is not meant to suggest the universe is a simulation, nor to frame the Theory of Generativity as a form of simulation hypothesis. The core idea is that generativity is nature's fundamental driving force, and that computer and information science naturally model it. The Maximum Information Flow Principle is explored across scales—from black holes and quantum systems to human inquiry and societal systems—unveiling deep symmetries in how information governs processes at every level. It introduces a recursive framework for optimizing inquiry, engaging with paradoxes as generative forces and reframing understanding itself as a participatory process. Preliminary numerical tests demonstrate I_max’s applicability across quantum and macroscopic regimes, while the paper’s structure mirrors its recursive dynamics, inviting readers to experience its principles directly. This work invites scrutiny, collaboration, and exploration. By aligning inquiry with generative principles, it opens infinite pathways for discovery, creativity, and understanding—transforming not just how we see reality, but how we participate in its unfolding. Due to the creative freedom taken by this paper, it is not currently intended to be published in a traditional journal. However, the paper will still be held to high standards for intellectual honesty and an acceptable level of rigor. Spin-off studies that validate or falsify the predictions of the framework are welcome. The GitHub repo for this paper, with experiments, numerical analysis, and AI case studies, can be found at https://github.com/nking-1/Generativity. Please email research@celetris.com for any inquiries, suggestions for improvement, or requests for collaboration.
computation, theoretical physics, information flow, relativity, observation, paradox, generative systems, philosophy, mathematics, quantum mechanics, black holes, thermodynamics, recursion, entropy
computation, theoretical physics, information flow, relativity, observation, paradox, generative systems, philosophy, mathematics, quantum mechanics, black holes, thermodynamics, recursion, entropy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
