Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Matthew's Kingdom of Heaven is No Modern Kingdom of God

Authors: Marc Grenier;

Matthew's Kingdom of Heaven is No Modern Kingdom of God

Abstract

Abstract: The essay begins by providing important background information about the essential general characteristics of Matthew’s Gospel related to authorship, motivations, and audience. Then it proceeds to closely examine some of the central features of its literary structure by identifying and addressing the interplay of its core motifs such as antagonistic religious authorities and Satanic forces, among others. The focus on theological motifs represents an effort to determine whether Matthew’s narrative was simply a slapdash stylistic modification of Mark’s Gospel, or unique in its own right. Particular attention is subsequently devoted to one of Matthew’s core theological organizational themes, ‘Kingdom of Heaven’, with the aim of examining to what extent it may improve understanding of important aspects of the Christian doctrine he wanted to emphasize. Matthew’s ‘Kingdom of Heaven’ is then contrasted with the ‘Kingdom of God’ concept to note similarities and differences, if any. After reviewing how the kingdom of heaven motif runs through all of Matthew’s five great discourses (Sermon on the Mount, mission, parables, church discipline, and End-Times), the essay concludes by suggesting that Matthew’s concept is radically different from the ’Kingdom of God’ concept employed in much of contemporary biblical scholarship especially in the heavy emphasis upon its spiritual dimensions.

Keywords

Authorship, audience, literary structure, core motifs, five great discourses, kingdom of heaven, kingdom of God, Matthew, Mark.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities