Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

CDR-PoEt Policy Brief: How Should Targeted Carbon Dioxide Removal Be Governed? 15 Guiding Questions for the Assessment of Policy Instruments to Manage CO₂ Removal

Authors: Holland-Cunz, Antonia; Baatz, Christian;

CDR-PoEt Policy Brief: How Should Targeted Carbon Dioxide Removal Be Governed? 15 Guiding Questions for the Assessment of Policy Instruments to Manage CO₂ Removal

Abstract

Germany aims to be greenhouse gas neutral by 2045 and negative from 2050 onwards. To achieve this, emissions which cannot be avoided or are very hard to avoid — so‐called residual emissions— must be balanced out with “negative emissions”. The way to do this is the targeted removal of CO2 from the atmosphere (Carbon Dioxide Removal, CDR). To remove sufficient CO2, it is necessary to incentivize CDR processes and projects through appropriate policy instruments—such as regulations, funding programs, or public information campaigns. Developing and implementing these policy instruments poses a challenge for decision‐makers. Our new assessment framework for policy instruments can assist in this process. In it, we propose fifteen guiding questions that decision‐makers should use for orientation when developing policy instruments to control, promote, and regulate CDR. These guiding questions help incorporate various societal values and goals into the decision‐making process and enable transparent and traceable communication of decisions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

#Transfer, #CDR-PoEt, #PolicyBrief, CDRterra

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?