
Background: Citrus x aurantium L. leaves are known to contain volatile oil, the composition of which varies depending on several factors, including the country of origin, climate, and extraction method. The components of the volatile oil extracted from bitter orange leaves have not received much attention in the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to compare two methods for extracting volatile compounds from bitter orange leaves (hydrodistillation and extraction with a Soxhlet extractor). Materials and methods: Leaves were collected from several areas in the city of Damascus, and a comparison was made between the two methods for extracting volatile compounds by determining the chemical composition using a gas chromatograph connected to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Results: Hydrodistillation resulted in a volatile oil with a pale yellow color, with a yield of approximately 0.5%, in which 27 compounds were identified. As for extraction with a Soxhlet extractor, an extract of a dark green color was obtained, with a yield of approximately 40%, in which 33 compounds were identified. It was noted that the most abundant compound in both methods was linalyl acetate, at a percentage of 49.79% in the volatile oil sample, and at a percentage of 56.01% in the extract sample. The monoterpene compounds also achieved the highest availability percentage in both methods, at 97.16% in the volatile oil sample, and at 59.77% in the extract sample. Conclusions: We conclude that it is possible to extract the linalyl acetate compound using both methods (hydrodistillation and extraction with a Soxhlet extractor), but to obtain volatile compounds isolated from other compounds, the method of hydrodistillation is the best.
Leaves, bitter orange, Citrus x aurantium, volatile oil, linalyl acetate, GC-MS, Soxhlet, hydrodistillation
Leaves, bitter orange, Citrus x aurantium, volatile oil, linalyl acetate, GC-MS, Soxhlet, hydrodistillation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
